Sunday, September 16, 2012

#6: Malicious Propaganda.


Monsanto is a company that produces products for genetically modified crops, to the public eye. Because of the widespread propaganda, such as billboards with titles “America’s Farmers Grow America,” people do not know of their wrong doings. There are not billboards posted mentioning them being sued, taking lives, and trespassing onto organic farmer’s farmland.

Monsanto’s RoundUp products help kill weeds that may appear on farmer’s land, without harming the crops. Sounds like a great idea, for those who do not want to grow organically. However, many American’s want to eat healthy, and organic crops are a necessity. Monsanto has been suing local farmers of organic products due to finding traces of their genetically modified products on organic grower’s land.

Organic growers do not want these products, clearly. What Monsanto is doing is totally wrong in my viewpoint. Due to the recent law suits pressed against farmers, people have been taking their lives, and their children have been taking their lives as well. Farmers rely on their crops to grow and sell to make a living. With a law suit going on, their business is corrupted. Monsanto tests farmer’s products for traces of their GM products. Of course, how these products got here, isn’t due to the farmer’s placement of it.

What about wind storms, and changing weather? This surely could account for it. Organic growers count on their products to be organic! It is not their fault that a small trace of their product is found in their fields by sneaky investigation. Monsanto, to me, seems like a very malicious company. Why post billboards trying to act supportive of local organic farmers, when they’re the people behind the ruining of organic farmer’s lives by robbing them of their jobs? It’s all linked to propaganda, once Monsanto’s wrong doings were in the public eye, they quickly tried to rebound with positive billboards. It seems to me that they know of their wrong doings, and are now, like the organic growers, trying to save their business.

#7: Sources.


Agger, Ben. Body Problems. NY: Routledge, 2011.

PubMed Health. "Anorexia Nervosa." MD: A.D.A.M Inc, 2012. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0001401/ (2/13/2012)
Kelley, Weber. Health Assessment In Nursing Fourth Edition. PA: Lippincott and WIlkins, 2010. Chapter 12, Pages 150-160.

Schlosser, Eric. Fast Food Nation. NY:Houghton Mifflin, 2001.

Bittman, Mark. Food Matters. NY: Simon & Schuster, 2009.

Lankford, Ronald D. Is Organic Food Better? MI: Greenhaven Press, 2011.

Wednesday, September 5, 2012

#5: SlutWalks.


Propaganda was used to relay the wrong message when the media got involved in “SlutWalks.”  SlutWalks were started after a police officer in Toronto said “women should avoid dressing like sluts in order not to be victimized.” SlutWalks encourage women and men of all ethnicities, background, and ages to come and support them by wearing whatever clothing they choose because they want people to know that there is not a dress code for sexual harassment/assault.

However, when the media got involved, there were pictures of white women dressed in provocative clothing such as fishnet stockings, knee length boots, short skirts and dresses, some with their undergarments exposed etc. This gave the impression that the goal of SlutWalks was to have girls come and dress like sluts and parade down the street. This is completely the opposite reason for doing SlutWalks.

When the writer of this article (SlutWalk: Does The Media Make The Message) attended one, she noticed women of all colors and backgrounds. Some were dressed eccentrically; others wore simple jeans and a t shirt, sweat pants, and everyday clothes. There were also just as many men attending as women, who she says proudly used the word feminist. There were mothers and children attending together as well.
This goes to show that simply by leaving things out of a story- such as pictures of men and children at the SlutWalks- that the public can get a skewed view of what is really taking place in their community. It was for a really good cause, going against the words of the Toronto police officer, letting people know that it is not the victim that is to blame for sexual assault.